Smester 2 Journal

Home Forums Ilijah Corbin Smester 2 Journal

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #365 Reply
    Unknown's avatarilijah

      This line marks the beginning of my Semester 2 journal. I will reply to this with all other updates.

      #373 Reply
      Unknown's avatarilijah

        Last reply was deleted. Testing 1..2…

        #374 Reply
        Unknown's avatarilijah

          Following Dr Ellis’ feedback on my initial FYP progress, I will continue reporting on the systems that govern bank transfers. So far only documentation that describes the flow of information and money exists, however, a more technical understanding of these systems is needed. This will require information from cenral bank officials and/or InforLink employees.

          #375 Reply
          Unknown's avatarilijah

            In a Trinidad Newsday article, Glynis Alexander-Tam, general manager of InfoLink Services, noted that ACH is a switch, and the process of ensuring that money goes where it is intended takes time. There was also mention that the time taken for a transfer to be executed is because of “validation”.

            Hence, I need to know now what a “switch” is and what about the “validation” takes time.

            #388 Reply
            Unknown's avatarilijah

              The defining stage of the GAP analysis is maturing. This includes a more clearly defined starting state (the current interbank network in T&T) and goal state (a real-time interbank network). The Zelle network in the United States in being used a model for the real-time system due to its ease of potential integration with the current system in T&T.

              #389 Reply
              Unknown's avatarilijah

                Gantt chart was updated based on the fact that only approximately 9 weeks are left until the project is due. deliverables for each week were created to stay on track for an April 5 submission.

                #397 Reply
                Unknown's avatarilijah

                  The first project meeting of the semester was held on February 3, 2026. My current progress on my project was validated. However, I was encouraged to speed up my timeline and aim to finish by the end of February.

                  I will update the Gantt chart to reflect this goal. While somewhat ambitious, this is a good aim. If I fall short, I’ll still be in a good position. I also still have to talk to stakeholders, so I do need to speed up.

                  #474 Reply
                  Unknown's avatarIlijah

                    Today I attended my second FYP meeting for the semester.
                    Deliverables: First draft due on March 20, 2026.

                    Today’s FYP work begins with a continued review of T&T’s national payment system. A general overview of the services and infrastructure was done already. However, a more detailed description of each element will be done. This will help gain an understanding of the key elements and infrastructure associated with a country’s payment system. This understanding will then become key when analysing global payment systems.

                    #506 Reply
                    Unknown's avatarIlijah

                      The meeting with an industry expert, Glynis, was scheduled today, Friday, 27 March. This means that all analysis and modelling should be completed by then.

                      A major section of the literature review was completed. This is the review of global payment systems from Brazil, Kenya and India. This is allowed for the development of the following framework. Operating Structure, Technical Details and Payment Process and Clearing and Settlement.

                      This will lead to a standardised definition of the current payment system and the future one. Hence, the GAP analysis could be completed.

                      Next steps are to model the current system using the developed framework. Then, to use design methods to describe an instant payment system for Trinidad and Tobago, based on the ease of integration. Then, to conduct the GAP analysis. Then, to present findings to Glynis.

                      #512 Reply
                      Unknown's avatarIlijah

                        The meeting with Glynis concluded on Friday, 27 March. The following objectives were met:

                        1. Presentation of the current state model/definition.

                        The majority of the model/ definition was verified to be accurate. However, there were minor mistakes which are to be corrected.

                        2. Presentation of the desired state model/definition.

                        The desired state model was verified to be plausible, given that a certain requirement is met, where banks have collateral that will protect them against risks associated with the settlement of funds.

                        3. Presentation of gaps.

                        Gaps were verified to be accurate, with additional gaps given, such as the ISO 20022 messaging standard and the collateral gap mentioned above.

                        #513 Reply
                        Unknown's avatarIlijah

                          Work continues on the design procedure to design the desired state. An approach that results in the easiest design to implement will be utilised.

                        Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
                        Reply To: Reply #513 in Smester 2 Journal
                        Your information: